Top 10 Differences Between Flask and FastAPI: Choose the Best Framework

Looking for a Postman alternative?

Try APIDog, the Most Customizable Postman Alternative, where you can connect to thousands of APIs right now!

Download Apidog

Introduction

When it comes to building APIs in Python, developers have a plethora of options to choose from. However, two frameworks stand out among the rest: Flask and FastAPI. Flask, a lightweight and flexible web framework, has been a popular choice for many years. FastAPI, on the other hand, is a relatively new framework that has gained significant attention due to its exceptional speed and performance. In this article, we will compare Flask and FastAPI, highlighting their key differences and helping you choose the best framework for your specific needs.

Speed and Performance Comparison

One of the major factors that differentiate FastAPI from Flask is its speed and performance. FastAPI is built on top of Starlette, a high-performance ASGI web framework, which allows it to handle a large number of concurrent requests efficiently. This makes FastAPI an excellent choice for building highly-scalable, performance-critical APIs.

In contrast, Flask is not designed for high-performance and may struggle with a large number of concurrent requests. Flask uses the Werkzeug WSGI toolkit, which is a mature and reliable framework, but it is not as performant as Starlette. Therefore, if speed and performance are crucial requirements for your API, FastAPI is the clear winner.

Data Validation Comparison

Another significant difference between FastAPI and Flask is the way in which they handle data validation. FastAPI uses Pydantic, a powerful data validation and parsing library in Python, to validate the data sent to the API. Pydantic allows developers to define data schemas using Python 3.6+ type hints and ensures that the data sent to the API is always valid. This not only improves the reliability of your API but also makes it easier to work with data.

On the other hand, Flask does not have a built-in data validation system. As a result, developers using Flask need to manually validate the data received by the API. While this gives developers more flexibility and control over the validation process, it can also be time-consuming and error-prone. If data validation is critical for your API, FastAPI’s built-in support for Pydantic makes it the better option.

To illustrate the difference in data validation capabilities, let’s take a look at the following example of creating a POST endpoint for a user registration API in both FastAPI and Flask:

FastAPI Example:

from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel

app = FastAPI()

class UserRegistrationData(BaseModel):
    name: str
    email: str
    password: str

@app.post("/register")
async def register_user(user_data: UserRegistrationData):
    # Perform data validation and save the user in the database
    # ...

Flask Example:

from flask import Flask, request

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route("/register", methods=["POST"])
def register_user():
    user_data = request.get_json()
    if not user_data:
        return "Invalid request data", 400

    name = user_data.get("name")
    email = user_data.get("email")
    password = user_data.get("password")

    # Perform data validation and save the user in the database
    # ...

As you can see, FastAPI’s integration with Pydantic allows for automatic data validation and type checking, making the code cleaner and more robust. Flask, on the other hand, requires manual validation and parsing of the request data, which can be more error-prone.

Syntax and Ease of Use Comparison

The syntax and ease of use is another aspect where FastAPI and Flask differ. FastAPI provides a more modern and user-friendly syntax, thanks to the use of Python 3.6+ type hints. The type hints not only enable automatic data validation but also improve code completion and IDE support. Additionally, FastAPI automatically generates an OpenAPI schema for your API, making it easier for users to interact with the API using tools like Postman or Swagger UI.

Flask, on the other hand, follows a more traditional approach to web framework development. It uses decorators to define routes and provides a simple yet effective API for creating web applications. Flask does not have built-in functionality for generating an OpenAPI schema, so developers need to use separate extensions for documentation generation.

To give you a better understanding, let’s compare the syntax for creating a simple GET endpoint in both FastAPI and Flask:

FastAPI Example:

from fastapi import FastAPI

app = FastAPI()

@app.get("/hello")
async def hello():
    return {"message": "Hello, World!"}

Flask Example:

from flask import Flask

app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route("/hello")
def hello():
    return {"message": "Hello, World!"}

As you can see, FastAPI’s syntax is more concise and expressive. It leverages Python 3.6+ type hints, providing automatic data validation and better IDE support. Flask’s syntax, while still straightforward, does not have this level of sophistication.

Advantages of FastAPI

FastAPI offers several advantages that make it an attractive choice for building APIs. One of its most significant advantages is its support for asynchronous programming using the asyncio library. FastAPI allows you to write asynchronous code using the async and await keywords, enabling you to build highly scalable and efficient APIs.

FastAPI also provides automatic documentation generation and code generation based on the OpenAPI schema. This means that you don’t need to write and maintain separate documentation for your API, saving you time and effort. FastAPI’s automatic documentation can be accessed via an interactive Swagger UI, making it easier for developers to understand and interact with your API.

Advantages of Flask

While FastAPI has many advantages, Flask still has its merits and continues to be a popular choice for building APIs in Python. One of the significant advantages of Flask is its simplicity and ease of use. Flask has a minimalistic design philosophy, making it easy to learn and understand. If you are new to building APIs or are working on a small project, Flask’s simplicity can be a significant advantage.

Another advantage of Flask is its flexibility and extensibility. Flask provides a solid foundation for building web applications and offers a large and active community with many third-party extensions and libraries. This allows you to add additional functionality to your API easily. If you need a framework that allows for more customization and flexibility, Flask is an excellent choice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between FastAPI and Flask depends on your specific needs and preferences. If speed, performance, and automatic documentation generation are crucial for your API, FastAPI is the better option. FastAPI’s support for asynchronous programming and automatic OpenAPI schema generation make it a powerful framework for building high-performance APIs.

However, it is important to note that Flask still remains a popular choice for many developers. Its simplicity, flexibility, and large community make it an excellent framework for smaller projects or for those who prefer a straightforward and lightweight approach to web development.

Ultimately, both FastAPI and Flask have their advantages and disadvantages. FastAPI excels in terms of speed, performance, and data validation, while Flask shines with its simplicity, flexibility, and active community. Consider your specific project requirements and preferences when choosing between the two frameworks, and remember that FastAPI is considered a step up from Flask and may continue to improve at a rapid pace.

Looking for a Postman alternative?

Try APIDog, the Most Customizable Postman Alternative, where you can connect to thousands of APIs right now!

Download Apidog